 Chris
Icelink
James
Quint
Stephen
TomLew
Zee
|
|
Coordinated Universal Time (UTC): Eastern Standard Time (EST): ~ Home Page ~ ~ Get To Know Your Staff ~ ~ IRC Client ~ |
| Welcome to The Cutthroat Syndicate. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Requirements | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Aug 11 2006, 12:00 PM (388 Views) | |
| Thefurby | Aug 11 2006, 12:00 PM Post #1 |
|
Unregistered
|
Not a flame about anyone under the requirements, but, why do we have requirements if everyones getting in anyway because they know someone in the clan :\? Seems silly to have them if they aren't doing anything. |
 
|
|
| I sk1lls I | Aug 11 2006, 12:12 PM Post #2 |
|
Unregistered
|
cXs used to be a skill clan, with next to no requirements and we are still not a completely based pk clan. the requirements are only for people who don't know anyone in the clan. But i do have to agree with you though. We could do something like this : 90 combat + no refs 85 combat + 1 ref 80 combat + 2 refs And so on. |
|
|
|
| Thefurby | Aug 11 2006, 12:16 PM Post #3 |
|
Unregistered
|
I've got no problems with the skill clan, just doesn't seem to make sense. Let someone in at a low combat and they don't have as much of an incentive to train. |
|
|
|
| I sk1lls I | Aug 11 2006, 12:22 PM Post #4 |
|
Unregistered
|
Look at it this way : Pros : An extra person spamming on pks and wars. An extra 2/3 opts. More posts on the forum More activity in chat Maybe a new friend Cons : A low level |
|
|
|
| Thefurby | Aug 11 2006, 12:24 PM Post #5 |
|
Unregistered
|
Why not just remove reqs :$ its not a problem WITH the lower levels, its just if we're goin to have some, why not have more :\ |
|
|
|
| I sk1lls I | Aug 11 2006, 12:26 PM Post #6 |
|
Unregistered
|
You have a point there, we might as well have our reqs as : 2 referals and no combat reqs.. |
|
|
|
| Runeblade | Aug 11 2006, 12:28 PM Post #7 |
Proud Member of Twin Terror
  ![]](http://z2.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)
|
furby has a good pint but still low levels brg in more clan members and clan gets bigger |
| |
 |
|
| friend2all1 | Aug 11 2006, 02:48 PM Post #8 |
uhhh...hes smiling on the inside
|
i like that 1 idea bout like 85 combat+ 1 referral and so forth thats a good idea
|
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JPONTneuaF4"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JPONTneuaF4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>  Im convinced that guild wars:nightfall is the coolest online game yet lol thats where i m now
| |
|
|
|
|
Icelink
|
Aug 11 2006, 02:54 PM Post #9 |
 
|
yeah i think its stupid. maybe i should recruit my level 3 friend who just started playing rs 15 minutes ago? |
|
|
|
|
Tom
|
Aug 11 2006, 04:32 PM Post #10 |
|
hunter22
|
People who actually are friends with somebody in the clan we don't like to decline them because they'll have more fun with a clan they have friends in and probably stay with us. The req. is mainly for people who have no referalls. We might just lower it again and say you have to have a referral or something.. I'll talk to Trog about it. |
|
|
|
| psycojake | Aug 11 2006, 04:56 PM Post #11 |
|
Unregistered
|
ok, but we shouldnt tell them that or else all these noobs who became friends with soeone in the game just to get into clan will come.. |
|
|
|
| Maximus | Aug 11 2006, 06:43 PM Post #12 |
|
Hail Sir Post-A-Lot !
|
Personally i don't think one of our members would just because friends with a noob and help him get in... |
<center>  </center> | |
|
|
|
|
Tom
|
Aug 11 2006, 07:14 PM Post #13 |
|
hunter22
|
he's right that wouldn't happen we make sure they're actually friends not just he's the one that told me about the clan |
|
|
|
| %Camels | Aug 12 2006, 08:28 AM Post #14 |
|
Oooh Look its 1000camels
|
Look. Furby is right. this clan is 90+ so from now we have to accept 90+ people Unless they have a MASSIVE ammount of referals and even then it should only go down to 80+ in that case. And all members below 80 should be taken off the memberlist as it brings our average down a lot for the sake of 5 members aswell as making it hard to recruit when they notice the below req people on the list. This may sound a bit harsh but CXS gotta grow man. I hope Hunter/Troggy pays notice to this and takes action ~ CAMELS ~ |
| [CXS Main Site] [CXS Forums] [CXS Memberlist] [Contact Me] | |
|
|
|
| I sk1lls I | Aug 12 2006, 08:51 AM Post #15 |
|
Unregistered
|
I think all of the lower levels should be allowed in with 3 + referrals. Only 90 + people are allowed on mmberlist though which is an incentive to train. |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Forum Suggestions · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
12:35 PM Jul 13
Administrators